.webp)
Understanding the Dunning-Kruger Effect
The Dunning-Kruger effect describes a cognitive bias where people with low expertise overestimate their understanding of a topic, while those with high expertise often underestimate theirs. In marketing, this plays out as stakeholders with limited experience offering strong opinions and decisions on marketing strategies, often to the detriment of the marketing team’s efforts and budgets. Unlike fields like medicine or law, where licensing ensures a baseline of competence, anyone can wake up one morning and declare themselves a "marketer." This freedom is great for democratizing knowledge, but it also fuels overconfidence.
Marketing is often seen as something anyone can jump into, perhaps because it's so intertwined with everyday experiences of branding, advertising, and social media. This accessibility makes many feel they can confidently assess what is good or bad marketing without the technical grounding needed for informed critique.
Everyone’s a Marketer: The Impact of Subjective Opinions
In many businesses, everyone—from senior executives to clients—has an opinion on marketing. It’s not unusual for a project’s direction to shift because a client’s family member or a non-marketing executive didn’t “like” a concept. These opinions are often rooted in subjective, personal taste rather than objective market research or data-backed strategy. The scenario is all too familiar: a boss who believes that their opinions on branding are as valid as those of an experienced marketing professional, or a finance team that sees a marketing budget as an “optional” expense rather than an investment.
In his book, Building Strong Brands, David A. Aaker states that subjective opinions often overshadow strategic brand decisions, as non-marketing stakeholders may focus on aesthetics or personal preferences rather than the brand's long-term equity. Aaker emphasizes the importance of aligning brand strategy with clear objectives to prevent misaligned efforts.This dynamic is frustrating for marketers, who must regularly balance creative innovation with stakeholder opinions that may not be grounded in an understanding of marketing’s nuances. A young marketer might find themselves explaining why a minimalist logo resonates better with a younger audience, only to have their ideas dismissed in favor of a more traditional look.
Overconfidence as a Budget Killer
This brings us to the budget issue. The Dunning-Kruger effect in marketing isn’t only about ego; it has tangible effects on resources. When non-marketing stakeholders don’t understand the strategic objectives behind campaigns, they are more likely to see marketing as an expense rather than a crucial growth driver.
In Marketing Management, Philip Kotler and Kevin Lane Keller explain how marketing budgets are often underfunded when stakeholders, especially those without marketing knowledge, fail to understand the long-term value of branding and marketing strategies. They argue that this lack of understanding can diminish the strategic impact of marketing efforts.
Khensani Nobanda, CM(SA) at Nedbank, provides a stellar example of bridging this gap. She regularly engages with the company’s CFO to explain the vision and expected outcomes of her marketing strategies, helping him see the long-term value and buy into the vision. This collaborative approach has led to award-winning campaigns that modernized Nedbank’s image and helped reach a younger audience.The problem for many marketing departments is that this kind of collaboration isn’t the norm. Instead, budget requests are often declined without a solid rationale, leading to subpar campaigns that don’t have the resources to create impact. This, ironically, only reinforces the Dunning-Kruger effect: without seeing results, stakeholders feel validated in their doubts about marketing's value, creating a cycle of undervaluation and underfunding.
4 Strategies to Counter Overconfidence and Build Buy-In
To mitigate the effects of the Dunning-Kruger effect and gain the support needed for effective marketing, marketers must communicate with key stakeholders in a way that is both informative and persuasive. Here are four strategies to help achieve this:
1. Demonstrate How Branding Supports Sales and Retention
A strong brand makes it easier for sales and retention teams to close deals and maintain customer loyalty. By reducing the need for extensive persuasion, a well-established brand lowers the barrier to engagement and makes it easier for business development to succeed. Illustrating this effect with case studies or data can help stakeholders understand that brand strength directly impacts the bottom line.
2. Align Marketing Strategy with Business Objectives
Show how your marketing strategy addresses the company’s current goals and pain points. If the company aims to expand its market share or target a new audience, highlight how the marketing approach directly contributes to these ambitions. When stakeholders see that marketing is not operating in a vacuum but is, instead, a direct response to business needs, they’re more likely to see its value.
3. Present the Cost of Acquisition and Retention
Break down the cost per client—both in terms of acquisition and retention. Many stakeholders assume that a good product will sell itself, but data shows that customer decisions are influenced by brand perception, not just product features. By providing a clear cost breakdown, you can illustrate how marketing efforts actually reduce these costs over time by strengthening brand perception and loyalty.
4. Show ROI Expectations for Both Short and Long Term
Explain the projected returns on marketing investments. Be clear about what spending on brand-building activities can yield in both immediate engagement and long-term loyalty. Use metrics to back up claims wherever possible, such as estimated increases in brand awareness, customer retention, or sales uplift. When stakeholders understand that marketing has both immediate and compounding benefits, they are more likely to view it as a valuable investment rather than a cost center.
Moving from “Cool Vibes” to Strategic Investment
It’s essential to convey to stakeholders that marketing isn’t just about “cool vibes” or keeping up with trends. Marketing is a science, built on research, data, and carefully planned strategies. Overcoming the Dunning-Kruger effect in marketing requires making it clear that, while subjective opinions have a place, they should not drive decisions at the expense of expertise and data-driven insights.
While reading Branding: In Five and a Half Steps, I noted that Michael Johnson was making the point that marketing success is based on understanding the target audience, market research, and creating a brand strategy that aligns with business goals, rather than being driven by personal tastes or whims.
Ultimately, marketers need to bring objectivity to the table, ensuring that stakeholders understand that their subjective views aren’t always indicative of a universal audience reaction. The real strength of marketing lies in its ability to bridge creative ideas with strategic goals—building not just awareness but meaningful connections with target audiences. By fostering collaboration, educating stakeholders, and backing up proposals with data, marketers can gradually break the cycle of overconfidence, turning skeptical stakeholders into invested allies.
